Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day when the project was defeated by voters recently (Image source: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it seems you’re not desired in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant was soundly defeated at the polls this week, as voters in the town of Milford, Massachusetts decided which they did not wish a casino resort in their backyards.

Three Down for the (Voter) Count

This has become a routine story in Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this thirty days. In this case, Foxwoods ended up being looking to build a $1 billion complex in the town that is boston-area compete for that region’s sole casino license.

As soon as the returns that are first coming in, it absolutely was clear that the casino vote wasn’t going to go Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat once the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be moving forward. Once all the votes had been in, the margin ended up being enormous: 6,361 up against the plan, and 3,480 because of it, or just around a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods spent a large sum of money marketing the casino, however it wasn’t enough to convince locals that it was a deal that is good the local economy, apparently. The opposition carried the day while they promoted the fact that there would be many new jobs created and more than $30 million in new revenue for the town.

‘Our city wasn’t for purchase,’ said John Seaver of the group that is anti-casino Milford. ‘They wanted to come in and call the shots, and they almost did. Nevertheless the social people rose up, pushed back and overwhelmingly said ‘this town is not for sale.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase crime in the city, as well as depress property values. That, along with warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most Milford residents to vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, more than arguments in benefit of building the resorts.

‘we think people are afraid of the unknown,’ Butera said. ‘There’s lots of myths in what gambling enterprises are…they are not these crazy hedonistic places. They truly are actually very resorts that are nice have actually a lot more to do [than] just games.’

The Milford vote was the last one planned at least for the right time being among a string of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve casinos integrated their towns. Applications can still come in for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor license in the state until the end of the however year.

While the recent results for casino companies have actually been poor in these votes, other businesses have experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their local communities, permitting them to compete for licenses into the Greater Boston Area and Western Massachusetts, respectively. Three towns have already supported intends to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though only one will ultimately get a permit through the state.

Other projects nevertheless hang within the stability. Mohegan Sun narrowly lost a vote to accept a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in reality, that they’re getting a formal recount associated with results later on this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is taking into consideration the chance of altering their plan and placing the entirety of their casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Establish Is Not Without Glitches

The latest Jersey online casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which will be why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of their online gambling platform was, for the most part, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, and also the verification systems are doing their job. In reality, the only real issue is that those systems were working a little way too hard, as quite a couple of residents had trouble proving these people were really in brand New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the launch that is soft of very first round of web gambling sites went live for players located in brand New Jersey. During the soft launch which is made to weed out any pests and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were permitted on each site. Still, genuine money play was available, making this the very first time state-regulated on the web gambling had occurred in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the right time of the launch. They included the Borgata, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites had the ability to run 14 gambling web sites, including a combination of both casino and poker that is online.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which stretches to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to all residents in New Jersey avove the age of 21 starting early week that is next. But according to some customers, there are definitely kinks in the system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, the most commonplace issue so far ended up being also the one that was the most predictable. Numerous people had trouble signing into the sites due to the known fact that either the geolocation pc software being used couldn’t make sure they were in brand New Jersey, or these people weren’t immediately in a position to meet other verification standards to be able to prove their residency.


For instance, some players tried logging in from different locations and still couldn’t look for a method to access any of the sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from a McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various web sites that they couldn’t tell where he was found, or that they didn’t believe he was in New Jersey. Then tried driving inland and north about five kilometers, but nonetheless could not obtain the sites to recognize he was in the state.

Driving another ten kilometers inland and wanting to connect from a restaurant also did not create any results. While some associated with sites now allowed him to register accounts, they still wanted some evidence of residency such as a software application bill which he couldn’t straight away provide.

And Brennen wasn’t the just one who went into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, however when we attempted to play they said I wasn’t in nj-new jersey,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who possessed a long call with customer support and saw her computer crash while trying to create up a free account on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that whenever they make an effort to do that statewide in the 26th, it is going to be mayhem.’

While few people reported those types of technical issues, the incapacity to prove one’s location seemed to be more widespread. While many industry specialists predicted some individuals would get locked from the sites as a result of being very near to the newest Jersey border, it’s unclear why this was occurring as much as 10 to 15 miles far from the state’s edges as well.

Hopefully, these issues are circumvented by the launch that is hard to come.

‘ The soft opening will be used to show the division that all systems perform as required beneath the stress of live gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls work well. Staff will continually gauge the progress of each and every platform provider before enabling them to open gaming to the general public on November 26,’ stated DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Debate

Well-known little person and star Peter Dinklage is not likely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could be regarded as exploitative or helpful depending on your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the largest casino in the united kingdom , has put out an ad to let the entire world understand he is looking to hire little individuals as ‘door dwarves’ at the venue for the vacations.

Risking being called a circus carney, the master promoted for the roles in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that the casino is looking to ‘create a team of Britain’s smallest bouncers Door Dwarves for its brand new entry in Cranbourn Street.’

Owner Claims Success

In accordance with reports, trials associated with initiative, which would introduce a force of individuals 4 feet 10 inches or smaller to man the entry to the casino, were thought to went ‘fantastically’ well, and as a result, the management at the location has been convinced to introduce the system on a full-time basis.

CEO and president of the casino Simon Thomas, attempting to justify the scheme, told the news that the device was simply the latest in a long line of dwarf employment opportunities during the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is a phenomenal london organization. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor individuals like Little Titch on the cast,’ explained Thomas, incorporating that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and little individual Tom Thumb perform at the location back in the day.

‘We had dwarves that are high-diving dived from the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he added. ‘So they’ve been very much part of the history of the place.’

How charming can you get. It is like Cirque du Soleil, however the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking characters, whom the typical Joe would like to not get a cross, hiring a team of smaller personnel does appear just like a strange move for the casino if they’re trying to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes by having a dwarf, so you might say, they are very good doorman,’ argued Thomas. ‘They can manage people much better than having an eclipse that is human the door as a number of the groups do in London. Nobody will probably choose on someone who is below-average height. It’s not quite a thing that is macho do, so it’s a very good way of managing the doorway.

‘ There is no discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, accumulating to borrow possibly the most over-used phrase regarding the century that is 21st dispute complaints that the place might be poking fun at little people. ‘i find we live in a global world of political correctness gone angry.’

But that it is, at the very least, exploiting them if we are to take the opinion that the job role is not poking fun at little people, should we perhaps take the opinion? Thomas himself stated that the initiative is ‘building on the heritage that is rich of activity’ so clearly it is not just their unintimidating stature which he wishes to make use of.

‘I am trying to run a very big entertaining complex and I have a lot of different people with plenty of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome president. ‘I have actually chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that task. These are typically very expert and have got to start it.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *